Could This Approach Help Your School Reduce the Risk of Exclusion?
- Kathryn Gibb
- 19 minutes ago
- 2 min read
Permanent exclusion is rarely about a single incident. More often, it reflects unmet needs, escalating pressures, and a lack of time to step back and understand what a young person is communicating through their behaviour.
The Enable Inclusion Team (EIT) developed a Reducing Permanent Exclusion Risk approach to support pupils at highest risk — and there may be valuable lessons here for schools.

The Role of Educational Psychologists
Educational Psychologists (EPs) were central to this work. By working alongside schools, pupils, and families, EPs helped shift the focus from managing behaviour to understanding need.
They supported schools to:
Build a shared understanding of pupils’ strengths and difficulties
Use tools such as the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and a Permanent Exclusion Risk Score to guide decisions
Develop practical, evidence-based strategies staff could use consistently
Strengthen relationships with families
Support was longer-term and relationship-based, typically lasting several months, allowing time for trust and change to develop.
What Difference Did It Make?
The impact was encouraging:
Almost 95% of pupils supported were not permanently excluded
Exclusion risk reduced and improvements were sustained
Attendance improved and suspensions reduced
Parents and teachers reported improvements in wellbeing
What Can Schools Take From This?
Many schools already do parts of this work. The EIT approach shows the value of bringing these elements together in a structured way:
Creating space to understand why behaviour is happening
Using simple tools to track risk and wellbeing
Working collaboratively with families
Drawing on Educational Psychology expertise to support reflection and planning
A Moment to Reflect
Schools might ask:
Which pupils in our school are currently at risk of exclusion?
How confident do staff feel in supporting them?
Could Educational Psychology input help us work differently — and earlier?
With the right support at the right time, permanent exclusion does not have to be inevitable.



Comments